Professional Article Review

About

This article is about how people feel uncomfortable about reporters ambushing them electronically for information on a report. Now that people can "live tweet" events, new reporters want accurate information they can give the public and quickly.

Article Review

This author takes the standpoint that it is a reporters job to give accurate information to the public. He says that journalists have been saying the public misinterpret their actions,"this how news is gathered and how the pubic gets accurate information when news breaks"(Farhi). Before this news reporters would knock on doors or ask strangers. The article does not show a clear standpoint of whether or not they agree with the claim that new reporters are attacking people via social media or not. The article gives plenty of evidence that is relevant. The author summarizes what happened in Oregon and how reporters are getting backlash for trying to get information about the event.

My Critique

The author does not give a clear claim. He gives good evidence to  prove a point, but it is not clear on what he is supporting. The evidence does give a good point of view as to why a reporter goes to social media first. There is self promotion within the article. There is a gallery of photos that show what caused the media reports. I don't understand what claim the author is trying to make. He does not give a clear statement of what side he choses.

Conclusion

This article was interesting how technology is now backlashing on reporters. Before technology it was hard to receive accurate or fast information, but now that we can get information faster people are not happy with it.

Article: The Washington Post


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Logo

AB Sequence

Semester Reflection